ArticleViruses2026
Bidirectional Temporal Association Between Cytomegalovirus Reactivation and Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Real-World Cohort Study.
Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are major causes of morbidity and non-relapse mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although their association has been extensively investigated, the temporal relationship between these complications and their impact on survival remain incompletely understood, particularly in centers where routine letermovir prophylaxis is unavailable and CMV is managed using a pre-emptive treatment strategy. This study evaluated the bidirectional temporal association between CMV reactivation and GVHD using time-dependent analyses and assessed their impact on survival in a real-world allo-HSCT cohort.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 100 consecutive adult patients who underwent allo-HSCT for hematologic malignancies between January 2016 and February 2025. CMV surveillance was performed by weekly quantitative CMV-DNA PCR, and reactivation was managed using a standardized pre-emptive treatment strategy. Patients who relapsed or died within the first 100 days after transplantation were excluded. The incidence, temporal sequence, risk factors, and prognostic impact of CMV reactivation and GVHD were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, while temporal associations were assessed using time-dependent Cox regression analyses.
resultsCMV reactivation occurred in 72 patients (72%), whereas GVHD developed in 51 patients (51%). Among patients who experienced both complications, CMV reactivation preceded GVHD in 32 patients, while GVHD preceded CMV reactivation in 14 patients. Older recipient age (42.3 ± 13.5 vs. 35.4 ± 11.2 years,
conclusionsCMV reactivation was highly prevalent after allo-HSCT and frequently preceded GVHD, supporting a bidirectional temporal relationship between these complications. Older donor age was associated with both CMV reactivation and GVHD. Although survival did not significantly differ according to CMV or GVHD status in this day-100 landmark cohort, clinically important CMV-related complications, including end-organ disease and platelet engraftment failure requiring eltrombopag, remained common. These findings indicate that a standardized pre-emptive strategy did not completely prevent CMV-associated morbidity. Because letermovir was not evaluated in this cohort, any potential benefit of prophylaxis should be interpreted as an inference from external evidence rather than as a direct finding of this study. Prospective multicenter studies incorporating immune reconstitution analyses are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.