Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655684›Full record

ArticleViruses2026

Development and Validation of a Passive Surveillance System for Early Detection of Pepino Mosaic Virus in Commercial Greenhouse Facilities.

Hester Roberts, David W Waite, Subuhi Khan, Stella Veerakone, Joe Tang, Jeremy R Thompson

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hester RobertsPlant Health and Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, P.O. Box 2095, Auckland 1140, New Zealand.
David W WaitePlant Health and Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, P.O. Box 2095, Auckland 1140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0184-2942
Subuhi KhanPlant Health and Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, P.O. Box 2095, Auckland 1140, New Zealand.
Stella VeerakonePlant Health and Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, P.O. Box 2095, Auckland 1140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4102-0804
Joe TangPlant Health and Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, P.O. Box 2095, Auckland 1140, New Zealand.
Jeremy R ThompsonPlant Health and Environment Laboratory, Ministry for Primary Industries, P.O. Box 2095, Auckland 1140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4015-4058

Funding

Ministry for Primary Industries 407136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of environmental nucleic acid (eNA), both DNA and RNA, as a means for surveillance has been a fixture in the scientific literature for many years. The application of environmental screening for genomic signatures of organisms of interest-particularly those of diagnostic concern-is a promising yet still under-utilised tool for sample screening. While the literature tends to focus on the use of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) to detect organisms of interest using metagenomic or metatranscriptomic sampling, this approach is not cost-competitive with more traditional targeted molecular test methods. Consequently, eNA sampling still has not gained significant traction in practical settings despite its popularity in ecological research. To address these issues in a biosecurity context, we report here the development of a testing protocol to monitor irrigation water for the presence of pepino mosaic virus (PepMV) that also includes an endogenous

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringPlant DiseasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, ViralWater MicrobiologyRNA, Viraldetectionenvironmental RNAhigh-throughput sequencingPCRpepino mosaic virusPepMVsurveillancevirology

Identifiers

PMID42655684
PMCPMC13517131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.