ArticleViruses2026
Cat-Related Injuries and Rabies Exposure: A Three-Decade Retrospective Analysis from the Zagreb Antirabies Clinic (1995-2025).
Article in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cat-related injuries are a frequent reason for antirabies consultation, but long-term data on their epidemiology and management remain limited, particularly in European settings that have transitioned from endemic sylvatic rabies to officially rabies-free status. We retrospectively analysed registry data on all patients examined for cat-related injuries at the Zagreb Antirabies Clinic, the Croatian Reference Centre for Rabies, between 1995 and 2025. Among 24,107 animal-related consultations, 3147 (13.1%) involved cats. Most patients were female (64.8%), and children under 18 years of age accounted for 14.7% of the patients. The offending cat had a known owner in 48.5% of cases and was unknown in 45.9%. Records associated with laboratory-confirmed rabid cats accounted for 4.8%, all from 1995 to 2012. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) was administered to 37.6% of patients, and human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG) to 2.9%. Hospitalisation was rare (1.1%), while injuries most often involved the fist and fingers (59.5%). PEP administration was strongly associated with the rabies risk status of the offending cat, increasing from 8.7% for known-owner cats to 62.0% for unknown cats and approximately 87% for suspected or laboratory-confirmed rabid cats (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.