ReviewViruses2026
Measles: A Narrative Review of Current Therapeutic Options and Implications for the Future.
Review in Viruses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the availability of a safe and effective measles vaccine for several decades, measles remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, causing 95,000 deaths in 2024 alone. Currently, there is no licensed therapeutic agent against measles, and treatment is only supportive. This is a review of articles published from 2015 to 3 June 2025, on therapeutic agents used or under investigation against measles. Ribavirin has been used in severe measles cases; nevertheless, there are no randomized clinical trials so far. New delivery systems, such as polymer-based formulations and nanoparticles, have markedly increased ribavirin's efficacy, while cytotoxicity remained low. Viral membrane fusion (F) protein inhibitors and viral RNA polymerase inhibitors are promising next-generation therapeutics against measles and have been tested in animal models with good results. Lastly, interferons (IFNs) are key mediators of the innate immune response against measles, particularly for controlling brain infection. There are few reports indicating that repeated remdesivir courses, as well as intraventricular or intrathecal ribavirin or IFN, may temporarily stabilize the neurologic status of patients with subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. Intracranial administration of protein F inhibitors also demonstrated promising results in mice. Although several antiviral agents and natural products exhibit in vitro efficacy against measles virus, further research is required to determine their safety, pharmacological properties, and clinical efficacy before they can be considered therapeutic options. Overall, the development of antiviral agents against measles has been extremely slow. Therapeutic agents against measles are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.