Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655536›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Training-FreeDetector-to-Promptable-Segmenter Integration for Stacked Cartons: Prompt Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-Offs.

Liang Yu, Qi Gao, Shuaiqi Yang, Hao Qiu, Xiaoyan Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liang YuSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Qi GaoSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Shuaiqi YangSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Hao QiuSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.
Xiaoyan MengSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China.

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2025B04045-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detector-assisted promptable segmentation can reuse box annotations, but prompt design creates an accuracy-efficiency trade-off in dense scenes. We study a training-free interface in which a detector trained with bounding-box annotations localizes stacked cartons and a frozen segmenter generates masks. Four interfaces are evaluated: Point-Single, Box, ambiguity-aware Point-Max, and Grid-Iter with sparse positive points and one mask-logit feedback pass. On a leakage-audited split, COCO mask AP, fixed-threshold Hungarian-matched metrics, paired bootstrap uncertainty, and synchronized latency were measured. On 773 test images, Box and Grid-Iter achieved mask AP values of 0.8984 and 0.8988. Their paired AP difference was 0.0007 (95% CI, -0.0035 to 0.0047), while matched-mIoU and F1 intervals also included zero. Box required 604.67 ms/image versus 677.33 ms/image for Grid-Iter. A YOLO26s-SAM 3 Box reference achieved a mask AP value of 0.9115 at 320.74 ms/image, whereas mask-supervised YOLOv9c-seg achieved a value of 0.9235 AP on the same cleaned split. The results indicate a metric-dependent Pareto trade-off rather than overall Grid-Iter superiority and position detector-to-segmenter prompting as a reproducible annotation-accuracy option for densely stacked cartons.

Indexed as

detector–segmenter integrationinstance segmentationintelligent warehousingpromptable segmentationSegment Anything Modelstacked cartonsYOLO

Identifiers

PMID42655536
PMCPMC13517170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.