ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Training-FreeDetector-to-Promptable-Segmenter Integration for Stacked Cartons: Prompt Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-Offs.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detector-assisted promptable segmentation can reuse box annotations, but prompt design creates an accuracy-efficiency trade-off in dense scenes. We study a training-free interface in which a detector trained with bounding-box annotations localizes stacked cartons and a frozen segmenter generates masks. Four interfaces are evaluated: Point-Single, Box, ambiguity-aware Point-Max, and Grid-Iter with sparse positive points and one mask-logit feedback pass. On a leakage-audited split, COCO mask AP, fixed-threshold Hungarian-matched metrics, paired bootstrap uncertainty, and synchronized latency were measured. On 773 test images, Box and Grid-Iter achieved mask AP values of 0.8984 and 0.8988. Their paired AP difference was 0.0007 (95% CI, -0.0035 to 0.0047), while matched-mIoU and F1 intervals also included zero. Box required 604.67 ms/image versus 677.33 ms/image for Grid-Iter. A YOLO26s-SAM 3 Box reference achieved a mask AP value of 0.9115 at 320.74 ms/image, whereas mask-supervised YOLOv9c-seg achieved a value of 0.9235 AP on the same cleaned split. The results indicate a metric-dependent Pareto trade-off rather than overall Grid-Iter superiority and position detector-to-segmenter prompting as a reproducible annotation-accuracy option for densely stacked cartons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.