ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Adaptive Control of Lower-Limb Assistive Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation Using Deep Reinforcement Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lower-limb rehabilitation exoskeletons have the potential to improve gait recovery after stroke by providing intensive and repetitive training. However, conventional control strategies often rely on fixed control parameters and exhibit limited adaptability to patient-specific characteristics, sensor noise, and dynamic uncertainties. This paper proposes an adaptive control framework that combines deep reinforcement learning (RL) with model-based impedance control for personalised lower-limb exoskeleton assistance. Patient-specific biological parameters are incorporated into the simulation environment and reward formulation to improve adaptability and robustness. Three state-of-the-art deep RL algorithms, Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3), and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC), are evaluated in a continuous control environment under varying signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions ranging from 5 dB to noise-free conditions. Results demonstrate that TD3 achieves the most stable learning performance, obtaining a mean reward of -354.24 under noise-free conditions, while DDPG provides the highest joint-angle tracking accuracy with an RMSE of 0.0369 rad. SAC exhibits superior robustness in noisy environments, achieving the highest learning ratio of 0.51 at 5 dB SNR. Furthermore, the proposed personalised framework reduces tracking errors by up to 27% compared with non-personalised baseline approaches. The findings indicate that integrating patient-specific information with RL-based adaptive control can significantly enhance robustness, tracking performance, and personalisation in exoskeleton-assisted gait rehabilitation, providing a promising direction for future intelligent rehabilitation systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.