Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655522›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Multi-Objective Optimization of Milling Process Parameters Using MOWOA and Comprehensive Performance Evaluation via AHP-TOPSIS.

Fada Cai, Rongfei Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fada CaiChengyi College, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.
Rongfei XiaChengyi College, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.

Funding

Chengyi College, Jimei University CK23052Education Department of Fujian Province JAT241249Xiamen Municipal Natural Science Foundation 3502Z202573304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To achieve the multi-objective collaborative optimization of milling processes, orthogonal experiments are conducted to develop prediction models for vibration acceleration and milling force, and range analysis together with variance analysis are adopted to reveal the sensitivity of each milling parameter to machining performance. Taking low vibration, small milling force and high material removal rate (MRR) as optimization objectives, the Multi-Objective Whale Optimization Algorithm (MOWOA) is employed to tackle this multi-criteria optimization problem, and a set of Pareto non-dominated solutions with balanced trade-offs are acquired. By integrating the weight assignment of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), comprehensive decision-making for all candidate schemes is implemented in accordance with practical machining requirements of users, and the optimal milling process parameters are determined. The results indicate an inherent trade-off among machining efficiency, milling load and machine tool vibration. An increase in the material removal rate will inevitably lead to simultaneous rises in milling force and machine tool vibration magnitude. The optimal combination of process parameters screened to meet comprehensive multi-objective requirements is spindle speed

Indexed as

AHPmaterial removal rateMOWOAmulti-objectiveorthogonal experimentsTOPSIS

Identifiers

PMID42655522
PMCPMC13517804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.