ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Enhancing Cerebral Blood Flow Quantification: A Comprehensive Review of Denoising, Artifact Correction, and Simulation in Arterial Spin Labeling MRI.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive imaging technique used to quantify cerebral blood flow (CBF) by using magnetically labeled arterial blood water as an endogenous tracer. Although ASL eliminates the need for exogenous contrast agents, its widespread clinical use is limited by several challenges, including low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), susceptibility to motion, and various imaging artifacts. To address these limitations, both traditional denoising techniques and Machine Learning (ML)/Deep Learning (DL)-based approaches have been developed to improve the reliability of ASL by reducing noise, correcting artifacts, and enhancing image quality. In addition, the generation of simulated ASL datasets has become an important strategy for training and validating novel methods when sufficient clinical data are unavailable. This review examines conventional image-processing techniques together with modern machine learning and deep learning approaches developed to improve ASL image quality through denoising and enhancement. It also discusses the major artifacts that affect ASL acquisition and summarizes the simulation methodologies used for the development and evaluation of new algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.