Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655510›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Enhancing Cerebral Blood Flow Quantification: A Comprehensive Review of Denoising, Artifact Correction, and Simulation in Arterial Spin Labeling MRI.

Shyna A, Jini Raju, Ansamma John, Chandrasekharan Kesavadas, Aditya Ajith, Manu J Pillai, Shameem Ansar, Ginu Rajan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shyna ADepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Thangal Kunju Musaliar College of Engineering, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Kollam 691005, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5098-3066
Jini RajuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Thangal Kunju Musaliar College of Engineering, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Kollam 691005, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6864-7618
Ansamma JohnDepartment School of Computer and Information Science, Vidya Academy of Science and Technology Technical Campus, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Trivandrum 695602, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6833-8011
Chandrasekharan KesavadasDepartment of Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum 695011, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4914-8666
Aditya AjithDepartment of Imaging Sciences and Interventional Radiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute of Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum 695011, India.ORCID 0009-0004-9956-9551
Manu J PillaiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Thangal Kunju Musaliar College of Engineering, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Kollam 691005, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-0281
Shameem AnsarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Thangal Kunju Musaliar College of Engineering, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University, Kollam 691005, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6790-9951
Ginu RajanCentre for Engineering Research in Intelligent Sensors and Systems, Cardiff School of Technologies, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff CF5 2YB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6152-6848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive imaging technique used to quantify cerebral blood flow (CBF) by using magnetically labeled arterial blood water as an endogenous tracer. Although ASL eliminates the need for exogenous contrast agents, its widespread clinical use is limited by several challenges, including low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), susceptibility to motion, and various imaging artifacts. To address these limitations, both traditional denoising techniques and Machine Learning (ML)/Deep Learning (DL)-based approaches have been developed to improve the reliability of ASL by reducing noise, correcting artifacts, and enhancing image quality. In addition, the generation of simulated ASL datasets has become an important strategy for training and validating novel methods when sufficient clinical data are unavailable. This review examines conventional image-processing techniques together with modern machine learning and deep learning approaches developed to improve ASL image quality through denoising and enhancement. It also discusses the major artifacts that affect ASL acquisition and summarizes the simulation methodologies used for the development and evaluation of new algorithms.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsArtifactsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningPerfusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingSignal-To-Noise RatioSpin LabelsSpin Labelsarterial spin labeling MRIartifactscerebral blood flowdataset simulationdeep learningmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42655510
PMCPMC13517180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.