ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Trustworthy AI-Powered Intrusion Detection for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) is transforming healthcare through continuous patient monitoring, telemedicine, cloud-edge services, and Healthcare 5.0. However, the rapid growth of interconnected medical devices has expanded the healthcare cyberattack surface, making intelligent intrusion detection essential for protecting sensitive medical data and ensuring resilient clinical operations. Existing reviews examine specific aspects of AI-powered intrusion detection but rarely provide a deployment-oriented synthesis linking technical performance with operational and clinical requirements. This review critically examines Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) for IoMT across six analytical dimensions: detection performance, explainability, privacy preservation, computational efficiency, benchmarking practices, and cross-dataset generalization. This structured narrative review adopted the PRISMA 2020 framework to ensure transparent record identification, screening, and reporting, with evidence synthesized qualitatively rather than through quantitative meta-analysis. A total of 5127 records published between 2021 and 2026 were screened, resulting in 24 primary studies supported by 115 complementary studies. The findings show that machine learning, deep learning, hybrid AI, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Federated Learning (FL), blockchain-assisted security, and edge intelligence have significantly advanced IoMT intrusion detection. However, despite benchmark accuracies often exceeding 95%, deployment remains constrained by dataset dependency, weak cross-dataset generalization, computational overhead, limited explainability, fragmented benchmarking, and insufficient operational validation. This review identifies deployment readiness, rather than predictive accuracy alone, as the principal challenge for next-generation healthcare cybersecurity and provides a practical framework for developing trustworthy, interoperable, privacy-preserving, and deployment-ready IoMT cybersecurity architectures supported by standardized evaluation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.