ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Impact of Regeneration on the Dosimetric Properties of LiF:Mg,Cu,P (MCP-N) Detectors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the dosimetric properties of standard (SD) and regenerated (RD) MCP-N thermoluminescent detectors over a wide dose range from mGy to Gy, with particular emphasis on the influence of readout mode, dose level, and temporal stability on detector performance. A total of 17 SD and 18 RD detectors were analyzed under standard conditions using two readout modes: a three-step READER mode and a continuous ANALYSER mode. Both detector types exhibit good linearity; however, deviations from ideal behavior at higher doses suggest the involvement of additional trapping and recombination processes. Glow-curve analysis indicates modifications in RD detectors, reflected by enhanced low-temperature peaks and slight shifts in peak position. Temporal effects also influence detector response, with stabilization observed after repeated irradiation-readout cycles. Fading remains low, with relatively stable signal levels over time. The results show that the ANALYSER mode provides improved stability and reproducibility compared to the READER mode, especially at higher doses, where increased variability and certain limitations were observed. Overall, regenerated detectors, despite reduced sensitivity, achieve performance comparable to standard detectors after stabilization. Optimization of readout conditions, particularly the use of ANALYSER mode, is essential for ensuring reliable dosimetric performance across a wide dose range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.