ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Physics-Informed Multi-Task Soft Sensor for Uncertainty-Aware Slag Tin Content Prediction in Top-Blown Tin Smelting.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Slag tin content is a key indicator of reduction efficiency and metal recovery in top-blown tin smelting, but delayed and sparse laboratory assays hinder online monitoring. This study proposes a physics-informed multi-task soft sensor (PI-MTSS) combining a shared temporal convolutional encoder, self-supervised future state reconstruction, a soft monotonicity constraint based on a simplified CO-temperature reduction-potential indicator, and Monte Carlo dropout for epistemic uncertainty estimation. The model was evaluated on a continuous 30-day dataset comprising 43,200 one-minute process observations and 240 laboratory assays, including 40 chronologically held-out test labels. Across five random seeds, PI-MTSS achieved an RMSE of 0.198, an MAE of 0.145, and an R2 of 0.889. Across three rolling-origin evaluations, it obtained a mean RMSE of 0.199 and maintained the lowest RMSE among the evaluated methods. The complete model reduced the physical violation rate to 3.5%. At 95% nominal coverage, its epistemic intervals achieved a PICP of 96.5% and an NMPIW of 0.245; the ACE across six nominal levels was 0.021, and uncertainty correlated positively with absolute error (ρs=0.691). These results support the potential of PI-MTSS for minute-scale monitoring and operator decision support under sparse labels, although validation remains limited to one month from a single furnace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.