ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Nostril-Anchored Geometric ROI Projection for Contactless Forehead Skin Temperature Estimation Using Low-Resolution Thermal Imaging.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Reliable forehead region-of-interest (ROI) localization remains challenging in low-resolution thermal imaging because limited spatial detail increases localization uncertainty. This study develops a lightweight nostril-anchored geometric ROI projection method for contactless forehead skin temperature estimation. (2) Methods: The forehead ROI was projected from the detected nostril bounding box using anthropometry-guided proportional geometry, followed by 95th-percentile (P95) spatial aggregation and exponential moving average (EMA) stabilization. Direct localization was evaluated against fixed-crop and MediaPipe Pose-based baselines using 120 annotated pilot frames across 0.5-1.5 m, followed by validation on 150 additional annotated frames from ten formal participants. A medical non-contact infrared forehead thermometer targeting the same central forehead region was used as a practical, rather than traceably calibrated, comparator. (3) Results: The proposed method outperformed the two localization baselines in the pilot evaluation. Formal-cohort validation achieved an overall IoU of 0.714, FIR of 0.870, and NCE of 0.091, with a 0.7% spatial-failure rate. Across 90 temperature measurements, the method achieved an MAE of 0.514 °C, RMSE of 0.614 °C, and mean bias of -0.187 °C, with 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement from -1.340 °C to 0.966 °C. Real-time implementation achieved 24.12±1.43 FPS on a Jetson Orin Nano. (4) Conclusions: The proposed method provides a computationally efficient forehead ROI localization approach for low-resolution thermal imaging. Localization was strongest at 0.5 m and lower at farther distances; therefore, its scale adaptation should not be interpreted as distance-invariant performance. The temperature results represent agreement with the practical comparator rather than absolute clinical accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.