ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Integrity as a Control Problem: Smooth and Adaptive Protection Levels for Multi-Modal Localization.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protection levels for autonomous vehicle localization are traditionally derived from estimator covariances under Gaussian assumptions. These approaches fail in complex urban environments where sensor anomalies produce heavy-tailed, non-Gaussian error distributions. This paper presents a fundamentally different paradigm that reformulates integrity monitoring as a closed-loop control problem. The method computes an instantaneous error rate from three sources: inertial sensor noise, kinematic drift between filter-based and dead-reckoned displacement, and LiDAR scan-map registration quality weighted by a sensitivity factor. This rate drives a saturation-controlled setpoint dynamics, then an adaptive PID controller with entropy-based gain scheduling produces the final protection level. Asymmetric update laws enforce rapid expansion but cautious contraction of safety bounds. Experiments on three UrbanNavDataset sequences (medium-urban, low-urban, deep-urban) demonstrate that traditional covariance-based methods exhibit high integrity risk, while the proposed framework achieves 0.0% risk in moderate environments and 2.3% under extreme degradation. The resulting protection levels are smooth and well-behaved, compatible with modern motion planners. This control-theoretic approach offers a viable alternative to statistical integrity paradigms in challenging real-world conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.