ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A FEM-Based Machine Learning Framework for Online Stress Field Estimation in Hydropower Regulating Rings.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data-driven surrogate methods are increasingly applied to real-time structural health monitoring of critical engineering systems, but their use is often limited by the computational cost of high-fidelity finite element (FEM) simulations. This work proposes an FEM-based machine learning framework combining FEM, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and Random Forest regression to reconstruct full-field von Mises stress distributions of a hydropower regulating ring from a reduced set of proximity sensor measurements. A calibrated 3D FEM model generated a representative dataset of operating conditions using a Design of Experiments (DOE) sampling strategy, reducing the simulation space. The resulting stress fields were reduced using a single global PCA model, and the retained principal components were predicted by a single Random Forest model trained on the guide vane opening and four displacement sensors installed on the turbine unit. Stress reconstruction was obtained via inverse PCA transformation and validated against FEM results through a leave-one-opening-out cross-validation, in which each guide vane opening was entirely withheld from training. The method achieved an average PSNR of 17.4 dB and SSIM of 0.837 across the eleven withheld openings, with 8 to 9 PCA components sufficient to preserve over 95% of the cumulative explained variance. A sensitivity analysis of the ensemble size showed that 100 decision trees provide accuracy comparable to larger ensembles at lower computational cost, and a feature importance analysis revealed the guide vane opening as the dominant predictor, with the four sensors providing complementary, fine-grained corrections. The framework enables near real-time reconstruction, requiring approximately 1.5 s per condition versus several hours for FEM. These results show that combining physics-based modeling with machine learning enables efficient structural monitoring for predictive maintenance and operational decision-making in hydroelectric systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.