ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A CPU-NPU Heterogeneous Edge Fault Diagnosis Framework for Industrial Sensor Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Industrial sensor-based fault diagnosis often requires continuous data acquisition, local data processing, and timely model inference on edge devices. Although deep learning-based diagnostic methods have achieved promising performance, many existing approaches rely on cloud-centered processing pipelines that introduce communication overhead and potential data privacy concerns. This paper presents a CPU-NPU heterogeneous edge fault diagnosis framework for industrial sensor data. The framework runs on an RK3588 local edge device and includes SQLite- and RingBuffer-based data management, sliding window generation, micro-batch construction, and model inference. The CPU is responsible for data access and buffering, preprocessing, and micro-batch preparation, while the NPU executes fault diagnosis models using the RKNN runtime environment. By performing inference locally, the framework reduces the continuous transmission of raw sensor data and supports real-time fault diagnosis under resource-constrained edge devices. Experimental results demonstrate high consistency between ONNX-based CPU inference and RKNN-based NPU inference after model conversion. Furthermore, the effects of different data input paths and micro-batch configurations are systematically evaluated. A cross-platform comparison between server-class CPU/GPU execution and embedded NPU deployment is also conducted in terms of latency, throughput, and energy efficiency. The results show that RingBuffer-based streaming input significantly reduces data access overhead, while the effectiveness of NPU acceleration depends on both model structure and micro-batch size. The cross-platform results further demonstrate the energy efficiency advantages of the RK3588 platform, making it more suitable for practical deployment in resource-constrained edge scenarios. These findings provide practical insights for deploying fault diagnosis models on heterogeneous edge devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.