ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Adversarial Machine Learning in Industrial IoT: A Systematic Review of Attack Realism, Defense Trade-Offs, and Deployment Gaps.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) integrates machine learning models for monitoring and control. However, they remain vulnerable to adversarial machine learning (AML) attacks, where an adversary adds small changes to the input data. These small changes degrade model quality, reduce accuracy, and can ultimately compromise the safety and security of the entire system. AML research in IIoT often focuses on individual attack types, defense methods, and datasets. Existing reviews lack a unified quantitative and system-level perspective. Therefore, a systematic literature review (SLR) is needed to provide a holistic analysis of existing attacks, defenses, and databases. This SLR analyzes 50 research articles to provide a holistic view of AML threats in IIoT systems and identifies seven distinct attack types: gradient-based perturbations, GAN-generated samples, poisoning attacks, reinforcement learning-based (RL) strategies, saliency-based feature manipulation, false data injection, and hybrid approaches. To illustrate the range of observed impacts, selected studies report the following degradation examples: saliency-based attacks cause accuracy reductions of 6-11 percentage points; iterative gradient attacks reduce accuracy from 95-99% to 30-40% in SIEM systems; and RL-based attacks reduce detection rates from 100% to 0% in rule-based IDS settings. In addition to the analysis of attack types, this SLR also evaluates current defense methods to protect IIoT systems. It has been observed that existing defense mechanisms lack generalization and require high computational resources. Moreover, the testing is performed under simplified threat models. The analysis of datasets further shows a clear gap between realistic industrial benchmarks (such as SWaT, WADI, and NSL-KDD) and synthetic datasets used for controlled experiments. By connecting attack behavior, defense performance, dataset characteristics, and system-level effects, this SLR identifies the key research gaps that must be addressed in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.