ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Comprehensive Review of Sequence and Generative Models in Motor Imagery (MI) Classification for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs).
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) classification serves as the backbone to brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) by strengthening the communication bridge between the human brain and external peripheral devices. The past two decades have witnessed unprecedented success in MI-BCIs, with applications not only in medical fields but also in several other domains, such as gaming and robotic control. Initially, MI classification primarily relied on classical signal processing techniques that were heavily impacted by signal variations; however, recent trends in deep learning (DL), specifically in sequence-oriented, attention-based, hybrid, and generative architectures such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), and transformers have significantly improved the efficiency and robustness of MI classification. This study presents a comprehensive review of these sequence-oriented, attention-based, hybrid, and generative architectures including RNNs, VAEs, GANs, and transformers, comparing their robustness across various public MI datasets, highlighting their challenges, such as inter-subject variation, low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and the obstacles in real-time signal classification. We perform an in-depth analysis on the strengths and limitations of traditional models such as RNNs and LSTMs as well as emergent models such as VAEs and transformers, which have demonstrated superior performance in extracting the intricate patterns of the EEG data with low latency. Moreover, we critically examine the future potential of such models in overcoming current bottlenecks, such as weak generalization on unseen data and high computational load. This study aims to assist researchers in attaining significant insights into the state-of-the-art sequence, attention-based, hybrid, and generative models used in MI classification, thus offering a direction for future innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.