Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655379›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Real-Time Vision-Based Fall Detection Systems for the Elderly: A Systematic Review.

Mahammad Nabizade, Réda Yahiaoui, Isabelle Lajoie, Nassima Nacer, Frédéric Auber, Moustafa Fayad

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahammad NabizadeSINERGIES (UR 4662), Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, 25030 Besançon, France.ORCID 0009-0007-0553-3315
Réda YahiaouiSINERGIES (UR 4662), Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, 25030 Besançon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4178-0432
Isabelle LajoieSINERGIES (UR 4662), Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, 25030 Besançon, France.
Nassima NacerLyRIDS, ECE, 75015 Paris, France.
Frédéric AuberDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, SINERGIES (UR 4662), Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, CHU Besançon, 25030 Besançon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7798-2060
Moustafa FayadSINERGIES (UR 4662), Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, 25030 Besançon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9509-4681

Funding

National Agency for Research ANR-23-CPJ1-0010-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Falls represent a threat to older adults, overload healthcare systems, and reduce quality of life. Vision-based fall detection has advanced recently through deep learning, yet most proposed models lack validation on physical hardware and do not report inference-time metrics. This systematic review, following PRISMA and Kitchenham guidelines, targets this gap. We focus exclusively on vision-based systems that report inference speed on a specified device. We define real-time performance using a threshold of 10 fps, based on the reported duration of the critical fall phase in real-life falls. From 588 records across IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and PubMed (2019-2024), only 11 met all inclusion criteria, highlighting how few studies validate real-time performance on physical hardware. The findings show that CNN-based architectures dominate algorithm choice, edge devices dominate deployment platforms, and optimization remains central to real-time inference on constrained hardware. Across these studies, we identify two persistent limitations: no real-world testing with older adults and reliance on small, controlled datasets with simulated falls.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumanscomputer visiondeep learningedge devicesfall detectionPRISMAreal-time

Identifiers

PMID42655379
PMCPMC13517638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.