ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Medical Image Fusion: Techniques, Evaluation, and Future Directions.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, multimodal medical image fusion (MMIF) has attracted significant attention due to its ability to integrate complementary information from different medical imaging modalities and provide more comprehensive information for clinical analysis. By combining anatomical information from modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with functional information from positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), MMIF can improve image quality and support subsequent tasks such as disease analysis, lesion detection, image segmentation, and treatment planning. This review provides a comprehensive overview of MMIF from theoretical and technical perspectives. First, commonly used medical imaging modalities and publicly available medical image databases are summarized and compared. Subsequently, the general workflow, fusion levels, and quality requirements of MMIF are introduced. Representative fusion techniques are then systematically reviewed, including spatial-domain methods, transform-domain methods, sparse representation-based methods, deep learning-based methods, hybrid methods, and emerging Mamba-based approaches. In addition, commonly used image fusion quality assessment metrics are analyzed, and the reported quantitative performance of representative MMIF methods is compared and discussed. Finally, current challenges and future development trends of MMIF are presented, including robustness, clinical translation, and emerging multimodal learning paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.