ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Resource-Aware Safety-First Active Sensor Acquisition with Few-Shot Commissioning for Edge Fault Warning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Edge monitoring balances diagnostic information against high-rate sensing costs. We formulate active acquisition: Low-cost signals screen each window, while high-information channels are acquired when alarms require confirmation or the screen is uncertain or out of distribution. The confirmation-complete controller includes an optional watchdog to bound blind intervals. On a five-stress benchmark, it retains 98.42% Macro-F1 versus 99.02% for always-full sensing, with 77.59% activation and 19.27% lower normalized resource costs. CWRU evaluation yields 99.25 ± 0.41% Macro-F1 at 83.30% activation. Paderborn condition-transfer evaluation matches always-full sensing at 91.08 ± 17.55% but activates every window; few-shot commissioning increases 15-bearing performance from 58.42 ± 18.60% to 76.52%. When each damage type is excluded from training and bearing identities are separated, the policy activates for 85.25 ± 18.84% of unseen-fault windows versus 83.61 ± 25.69% for a learned error gate. Across 40 healthy-to-unseen replays, 95% activate within five decision windows; an H=10 watchdog limits the inactive run to nine. These rates measure escalation, not unknown-class identification. An ESP32 pilot verifies telemetry feasibility but not sensor-rail power or end-to-end diagnosis. Reduced sensing is credible when the confirm stage transfers; otherwise, commissioning or conservative acquisition is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.