ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Markerless On-Device Detection of Compensatory Movement Patterns in Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Exercises from Monocular RGB Video: A Validation Study in Healthy Adults.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurological disorders drive demand for prolonged upper-limb rehabilitation, yet specialist access is uneven and assessment stays subjective. Marker-based and inertial measurement unit (IMU) systems are accurate but costly and impractical at home, while pose estimation pipelines mostly stop at keypoints, and many process video server-side, raising privacy concerns. We present a markerless pipeline that analyzes monocular RGB video entirely on-device in the browser, so it never leaves the machine. From 33 BlazePose keypoints, it derives five geometric metrics designed to limit body-size dependence-incomplete elbow extension, inter-limb asymmetry, shoulder girdle elevation, lateral trunk lean, and head tilt-compared against empirically calibrated, preliminary thresholds; a finite-state machine segments repetitions, and the flags are pooled into an unvalidated, exploratory quality score. Against an IMU reference over the 0-62∘ range that the recordings cover, the image-plane angle showed a mean absolute error of 2.18∘, below the pre-specified 5∘ tolerance, a trajectory-averaged bias within ±2∘, and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient of 0.956; the difference is, however, proportional to the angle-about 4% of the measured value-so the accuracy should not be extrapolated to larger elevations, and because that comparison was made offline, it does not include the timing error of the causal real-time path. On a single seated frontal-plane abduction task, with 18 healthy volunteers simulating the compensations and annotated by two independent clinicians blind to the instructed condition, compensation detection reached a macro-averaged F1 of 0.75 and 0.72 against the individual raters. The five signs differ in maturity: near-expert for trunk lean and head tilt, moderate for incomplete elbow extension and inter-limb asymmetry, and weakest for shoulder elevation, which a single frontal view cannot fully disentangle from the abduction motion. Running at 22-30 frames per second on consumer laptops without relying on a discrete GPU, it offers an accessible, privacy-preserving proof-of-concept foundation for home telerehabilitation; generalization beyond this one exercise and effectiveness on genuine post-stroke compensations remain to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.