Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655363›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Numeric Analysis of Polarized Lidar Contrast Enhancement Across Diverse Targets in Fog.

Manuel Petzi, Dominik Reitzle, Alwin Kienle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel PetziInstitut für Lasertechnologien in der Medizin und Meßtechnik an der Universität Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 12, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-3508-698X
Dominik ReitzleInstitut für Lasertechnologien in der Medizin und Meßtechnik an der Universität Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 12, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.
Alwin KienleInstitut für Lasertechnologien in der Medizin und Meßtechnik an der Universität Ulm, Helmholtzstr. 12, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7220-1416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lidar systems are of major importance for driver assistance systems and autonomous driving, but their obstacle detection range can be heavily impaired by adverse weather conditions like fog. To mitigate the effects of fog, the use of polarized light has been proposed. We simulated a polarized lidar system, taking Mie theory-based scattering functions for different fog types at several wavelengths into account, and investigated the possible increase in contrast between fog backscattering and target returns for different surface types, depending on the target orientation and the polarizer configuration. Fog is modeled as an infinite, homogeneous, scattering, and absorbing medium. The simulated detector registers the time-dependent radiance, resolved by scattering order. Our findings show that the suitable choice of illumination and detection polarization allows the amount of single-scattered light detected to be reduced by two to four orders of magnitude and the contrast between fog and target to be increased significantly. Crucially, this approach delivers robust contrast enhancement regardless of whether the target surface is depolarizing Lambertian or perfectly reflecting.

Indexed as

lidarlight scatteringMonte Carlo simulationpolarizationradiative transferturbid media

Identifiers

PMID42655363
PMCPMC13517271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.