Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655349›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

ADS Guard: A Generalizable Defense Framework for Adversarially Robust Occupancy Detection in Smart Buildings.

Pratiksha Chaudhari, Yang Xiao, Wei Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pratiksha ChaudhariDepartment of Computer Science, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0290, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-2596-4214
Yang XiaoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0290, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8549-6794
Wei SunSchool of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230002, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupancy detection is fundamental to the operational intelligence of smart buildings, driving critical functions in energy management, HVAC automation, and physical security. While modern Deep Learning (DL) models have achieved high accuracy in parsing complex environmental sensor data, they remain highly vulnerable to adversarial examples, imperceptibly perturbed inputs designed to deceive neural networks. These vulnerabilities pose severe real-world risks, ranging from energy sabotage, in which systems heat empty rooms, to critical security breaches in which intruders go undetected. To address this security gap, we propose ADS-Guard, a novel Adversarial Detection and Sanitization (ADS) framework rooted in sequence-to-sequence autoencoder purification. Unlike standard denoising techniques, ADS-Guard incorporates a latent consistency regularization mechanism that encourages alignment between clean and adversarial representations in the latent feature space. We evaluated ADS-Guard using a comprehensive experimental pipeline comprising five distinct DL architectures (LSTM, GRU, 1D-CNN, MLP, and Transformer) across three diverse datasets: (1) The UCI Occupancy dataset (20,699 samples) for standard binary detection; (2) Building59 dataset (7200 samples) for three-class occupancy-level classification (Low, Medium, High); and (3) Room Occupancy dataset (10,129 samples), representing a highly imbalanced binary occupancy-detection task. We evaluate ADS-Guard against both Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) attacks across diverse occupancy datasets and model architectures. We further assess the framework under adaptive white-box attacks and compare its performance with FGSM-based and PGD-based adversarial training baselines. Our results demonstrate that adversarial attacks can substantially degrade occupancy-detection performance across datasets and model architectures. ADS-Guard consistently improves robustness relative to undefended models against both FGSM and PGD attacks, recovering a substantial portion of the lost performance in binary occupancy tasks and providing meaningful gains in the more challenging multi-class setting. Furthermore, ADS-Guard remains effective under stronger adaptive threat models while providing a practical retraining-free defense that can be integrated with existing occupancy-detection systems without modifying downstream classifiers.

Indexed as

adversarial attacksdeep learningdefense mechanismdevicesIoT sensorsmachine learningoccupancy detectionsecuritysmart buildings

Identifiers

PMID42655349
PMCPMC13517422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.