ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
MOT-Assisted Object-Level Point Cloud Extraction from Multi-View Observations.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Object-level point cloud extraction is relevant to robotic perception and may provide useful object-centric observations for mapping and SLAM. Many existing methods rely on per-frame instance segmentation, resulting in high computational cost and limited ability to extract multiple objects simultaneously in multi-object scenarios. This paper proposes an efficient MOT-assisted pipeline for multi-view object point cloud extraction. The pipeline first employs 2D multi-object tracking (MOT) to establish consistent object correspondences across views, and then combines monocular depth-based reconstruction with multi-view geometric association to estimate coarse object locations. An adaptive spherical proposal and a density-based refinement strategy are further introduced to extract clean object-specific point clouds while suppressing background noise and outliers. Experiments on the DTU, MVImgNet, and ScanNet++ datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Relative to the unprocessed scene-level point cloud, the Chamfer Distance is reduced from 90.97 mm to 12.52 mm and Precision increases from 0.2998 to 0.8776 on DTU dataset Sequence 30. On MVImgNet, the Chamfer Distance decreases from 1.23 m to 0.46 m and Precision increases from 0.4777 to 0.9337, demonstrating effective removal of non-target scene points under real-world viewing conditions. Moreover, the proposed method reduces the cost of object-level association and provides competitive object-level extraction quality under the tested settings. Compared with the closely matched segmentation-based extraction, the proposed method provides lower measured object extraction runtime and built-in cross-view Track-ID association, while sacrificing some boundary accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.