Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655340›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Sensor-Based Tracking and Localization of In-Line Inspection Tools in Oil and Gas Pipelines: A Review.

Jianfeng Zheng, Bingfeng Ju, Anyu Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianfeng ZhengSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.ORCID 0009-0006-3509-0706
Bingfeng JuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.
Anyu SunSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310030, China.

Funding

Pipechina AQWH202502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate tracking and localization of in-line inspection (ILI) tools are essential for mileage calibration, defect mapping, and blockage prevention in oil and gas pipelines. This review summarizes sensor-based approaches for external ILI-tool localization, emphasizing how sensing physics, deployment geometry, and signal interpretation determine practical performance. Extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic tracking is first examined through dipole modeling, sensor evolution, and weak-signal recovery under steel-pipe and soil shielding. Distributed fiber-optic sensing is then reviewed as a continuous-tracking alternative, with attention to fading mitigation, spatiotemporal denoising, and trajectory extraction from distributed acoustic sensing data. Acoustic arrays and hybrid schemes are discussed as complementary options for subsea or cable-free environments. Finally, the review assesses how data fusion and lightweight artificial intelligence (AI) can improve robustness while noting unresolved issues in field data availability, edge computing, and uncertainty quantification. The synthesis indicates that next-generation ILI tracking should combine heterogeneous sensing, physics-aware signal processing, and deployment-aware model design rather than rely on a single high-sensitivity sensor.

Indexed as

distributed acoustic sensingELF magnetic sensingin-line inspectionintelligent sensingpipeline inspection gaugesensor fusiontracking and localization

Identifiers

PMID42655340
PMCPMC13517875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.