ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Physics-Informed Benchmarking Framework for Machine Learning and Tree-Based Ensembles in IIoT-Enabled Predictive Maintenance.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable Predictive Maintenance (PdM) in Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) environments is challenged by severe class imbalance, heterogeneous sensor variables, inconsistent experimental protocols, and deployment constraints. This study proposes a Physics-Informed Benchmarking Framework that integrates engineering-guided feature construction, Mutual Information (MI)-based feature relevance analysis, standardized model development, and deployment-oriented evaluation within a unified and reproducible workflow. Using the AI4I 2020 Predictive Maintenance Dataset, Logistic Regression, Isolation Forest, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were evaluated using identical feature representations, train-test partitions, preprocessing procedures, and imbalance-handling strategies. The engineered feature space incorporates thermal, mechanical, interaction, and degradation-related information derived from the original sensor measurements. The results show that tree-based ensembles provide the strongest overall performance under severe class imbalance. Random Forest achieved an accuracy of 0.986, an F1-score of 0.722, and a ROC-AUC of 0.983, providing the best balance between failure detection and false-alarm control. XGBoost achieved an accuracy of 0.978, a recall of 0.853, and the lowest inference latency of 0.35 ms, indicating its suitability for latency-sensitive IIoT deployment. These findings demonstrate that combining engineering-guided feature representation with a standardized evaluation protocol enables fair comparison of representative learning paradigms while preserving engineering interpretability and deployment relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.