ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Data-Efficient Unsupervised Recalibration of Calorimeter Sensor Arrays Using Wasserstein Adversarial Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data-Efficient Unsupervised Recalibration of Calorimeter Sensor Arrays Using Wasserstein Adversarial Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large distributed sensor arrays require repeated recalibration as radiation damage, material aging, gain variation, and readout drift alter channel responses. We studied a high-granularity calorimeter as a large sensor array and addressed unsupervised recalibration from two unpaired datasets: a nominal reference response and an aged response with attenuated cell-wise signals. Aging was modeled by a deterministic sensor-wise base field with reading-level stochastic variation; the base coefficients were used only for post-training evaluation. We evaluated a Wasserstein adversarial calibration field against an evaluation-only global-mean coefficient predictor and two non-adversarial estimators, a per-cell mean-energy ratio and independent per-cell Wasserstein matching. The adversarial objective supplied an adaptive event-level discrepancy over the full sensor array. In a hierarchical data-efficiency study with four reference/aged sampling-seed combinations and three configured-seed adversarial fits per seed combination, the adversarial method achieved an RMSE from 0.0238±0.0014 to 0.0173±0.0012 and a positive R2 from 0.828±0.022 to 0.910±0.013 across the tested event counts. Its RMSE was also below the approximately 0.0579 global-mean reference at every event count, demonstrating the recovery of cell-wise coefficient variation beyond the global mean. The mean-energy-ratio and Wasserstein-only estimators remained below the R2=0 reference in this sparse benchmark.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.