ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Computer Vision-Based Information Extraction from Electrical Assets: A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated inspection of electrical equipment has become increasingly important as utilities seek to replace inefficient manual processes in infrastructure management. Electrical-equipment nameplates contain critical technical information, but automatically extracting this information remains challenging. Although this topic has attracted growing research interest, the literature has not yet been systematically synthesized. This review addresses three research questions: (1) What real-world challenges affect the inspection and maintenance of electrical equipment, and what research gaps and opportunities remain? (2) Which computer vision and deep learning algorithms and architectures are used to extract text and digits from electrical equipment images? (3) Which metrics, datasets, and evaluation methodologies are used to assess these approaches? We conducted a systematic literature review in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Peer-reviewed English-language studies published between 2020 and 2026 were retrieved from IEEE Xplore, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, the ACM Digital Library, and complementary semantic-search sources; the final searches were conducted in May 2026. The screening and eligibility process reduced 19,760 initial records to 66 primary studies. Owing to substantial heterogeneity in tasks, datasets, and metrics, the evidence was synthesized narratively and in structured tables rather than through meta-analysis. DBNet and CRNN were among the most frequently used architectures for text detection and recognition, respectively, whereas integrated end-to-end systems emerged as a promising research direction. The scarcity of standardized public datasets remains a major barrier to objective comparison and cumulative progress in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.