ReviewPolymers2026
Recycling of Flexible Plastic Films: Emergent Technologies.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plastic is a valuable material for packaging of food and pharmaceuticals, protective wrappings in construction and agriculture, and fluid storage. Flexible plastic or plastic film waste from packaging, agriculture, and construction applications grows at a rate of at least 92 million metric tons a year, is considered challenging to recycle, and is typically landfilled. In recent years, there have been great advancements in plastic recycling technology in order to deal with the global challenge of plastic waste buildup and support legislation from a local to national level to implement recycling. This work highlights the most recent advancements in plastic film recycling. Plastic films are mono- or multilayered based on what their applications will be, with multilayer multimaterial films being the more challenging feedstock for recycling. Mechanical recycling cannot easily process flexible films. Pyrolysis can use polyolefin-based film as feedstock but is not practiced at scale to match the rate of plastic film waste generation, and incineration can recover energy from film feedstock but is not recycling plastic. This has motivated the development of new recycling technologies designed around plastic films. Better characterization technologies to identify film compositions in municipal waste streams have been key to sorting out film feedstock for mechanical recycling and the baling of flexible plastic waste, but they struggle with multilayer films and black plastic. Compatibilization enables the recycling of mixed plastic waste but requires polymer compositions for selecting specific compatibilizers. Dissolution-precipitation recovers individual types of polymers from multilayer films and, at the same time, can purify polymers from additives or contaminants, but requires intense solvent processing and associated energy. Delamination of multilayer films can separate and recover solid films of polyolefins at relatively low amounts of solvent but requires quality feedstock to be efficient. Both dissolution-precipitation and delamination recycling of films recover the original polymer molecules and maintain their embodied energy, hence support circularity. In the case of PET-containing films, depolymerization to recover PET monomers offers opportunities to recycle challenging film feedstock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.