Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655236›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Process Parameter Optimization and Straightness Error Prediction in FDM Based on PB-CCF Design.

Li Yang, Tianlu Wei, Pei Li, Jing Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li YangSchool of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Bengbu University, Bengbu 233000, China.ORCID 0009-0000-6793-7840
Tianlu WeiSchool of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Bengbu University, Bengbu 233000, China.
Pei LiSchool of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Bengbu University, Bengbu 233000, China.
Jing ZhaoSchool of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Bengbu University, Bengbu 233000, China.ORCID 0009-0003-7654-3124

Funding

Bengbu University 2024YYX01QD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fused deposition modeling (FDM) involves numerous process parameters, making it difficult to efficiently identify key influencing factors and achieve accurate prediction of straightness errors in printed parts. To address these issues, this paper proposes a two-stage experimental optimization and prediction method combining Plackett-Burman (PB) design and central composite design (CCD). First, PB experiments were conducted to screen nine process parameters and identify two significant factors affecting straightness error: layer height and line width. Subsequently, a face-centered central composite design (CCF) was employed to establish a quadratic response surface regression model for analyzing the main effects and interaction effects of the selected factors. Based on 18 sets of CCF experimental data, response surface methodology (RSM) and decision tree-genetic algorithm (DT + GA) prediction models were constructed, and their generalization capabilities were evaluated using five independent reserved experiments. The results show that the quadratic regression model exhibits a coefficient of variation of 2.21% and a signal-to-noise ratio of 45.45, indicating good fitting accuracy. On the test set, RSM achieves a mean squared error (MSE) of 7.29 × 10

Indexed as

CCFdecision tree-genetic algorithmfused deposition modelingPlackett-Burman designresponse surface methodologystraightness error

Identifiers

PMID42655236
PMCPMC13516702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.