ReviewPolymers2026
Highly Viscoelastic Rubber Extrusion: Evolution and Future Perspectives-A Review.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rubber extrusion has evolved through overlapping advances in equip design, rheological characterization, numerical modeling, sensing, and control. This structured critical narrative review synthesizes 180 sources published from 1972 to 2026, assembled through iterative keyword searching and backward and forward citation tracing. The conventional three-zone theory of solid conveying, compression, and metering is used as a bounded analytical framework, while the literature is organized into four overlapping analytical periods spanning empirical design, constitutive and numerical modeling, engineering-scale simulation, and multiphysics and data-enabled methods. Evidence is distinguished among direct rubber-extrusion validation, rubber-material or rheological studies, transferable general polymer extrusion studies, and enabling computational, sensing, or control research. Five persistent challenges are identified: formulation-dependent nonlinear rheology; incomplete representation of filler-network evolution and wall slip; limited cross-machine and cross-formulation validation; high computational cost; and the lack of standardized datasets and reporting protocols. Digital twins, physics-informed neural networks, and neural operators are promising but remain insufficiently validated for industrial rubber extrusion. Priorities include transparent benchmark datasets, evidence-graded, uncertainty- and latency-aware validation, multimodal sensing, transferable reduced-order and learned models, and measurable sustainability indicators. Together, these priorities define a validation-oriented roadmap for more reliable, transferable, and sustainable rubber-extrusion modeling and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.