ArticleMicroorganisms2026
Comparative Effects of Conventional and Systemic Biologicals on the Development and Yield of Two Carrot Cultivars.
Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic biologicals have emerged as a disruptive technology for overcoming the limitations of conventional biologicals. The effectiveness of systemic and conventional biological products in improving the growth and yield of two carrot cultivars was compared. Carrot plants were inoculated with either systemic or conventional biofertilizers and nematicides, and various growth parameters and yields were compared. As expected, the first indicator of the proper functioning of the systemic biofertilizer was increased chlorophyll content (two-variety averages: systemic = 17.1, conventional = 11.8, control = 10.9 mg g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.