ArticleMicroorganisms2026
Dominant Effect of Ecological Restoration on Microbial Carbon Cycle in Plant Rhizosphere of Mining Areas.
Article in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rhizosphere microorganisms play critical roles in biogeochemical processes including carbon cycling; however, their linkages to carbon-cycling functions under distinct mine restoration approaches remain unclear. In this study, we compared natural and artificial vegetation restoration via metagenomic sequencing to characterize rhizosphere microbial communities and carbon-cycling functional genes. Artificial restoration (AR) decreased soil electrical conductivity (EC) and salt content (SC) while increasing total phosphorus and available phosphorus by 12.33% and 16.44%, respectively. AR also elevated the relative abundances of genes responsible for degrading aromatic compounds, lignin and starch, along with genes participating in carbon-fixation pathways. Taxa of the Actinomycetia, Chloroflexi, and Solirubrobacterales served as the primary contributors to genes encoding 2-isopropylmalate synthase, α-glucosidase, malate synthase, and α-mannosidase, as well as carbon-fixation-related genes, including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.