Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42654680›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Evaluation of WCLV (1.2344), Uddeholm Unimax, and Uddeholm QRO 90 Supreme Tool Steels for Die Forging.

Maciej Wąsowicz, Adam Patalas, Artur Meller, Stanisław Legutko, Piotr Siwak, Vit Černohlávek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maciej WąsowiczFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Jacka Rychlewskiego 1, 61-131 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0009-0008-4957-137X
Adam PatalasFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Jacka Rychlewskiego 1, 61-131 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5476-6739
Artur MellerFabryka Armatur "Swarzędz" sp. z o.o., ul. Świerkowa 27, Rabowice, 62-020 Swarzędz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6992-7822
Stanisław LegutkoFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Jacka Rychlewskiego 1, 61-131 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8973-5035
Piotr SiwakFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, ul. Jacka Rychlewskiego 1, 61-131 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5785-0810
Vit ČernohlávekFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, J. E. Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Pasteurova 3334/7, 400 01 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6816-1124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of the wear performance of three hot-work tool steels-WCLV (1.2344), Uddeholm Unimax, and Uddeholm QRO 90 Supreme-for die forging applications. The materials were characterized in terms of hardness and bulk chemical composition using Vickers hardness testing and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Tribological behavior was investigated using ball-on-disc tests, while industrial performance was assessed by analyzing forging punches after the production of 16,250 components. Surface degradation was quantified using optical profilometry and three-dimensional roughness parameters. Measured hardness values were 591 HV for WCLV, 622 HV for QRO 90 Supreme, and 639 HV for Uddeholm Unimax. The average friction coefficients were 0.88, 0.92, and 0.77, respectively. Unimax also exhibited the lowest volumetric wear, reaching 0.04683 mm

Indexed as

abrasive wearhot forginghot-forming tool steelstool lifetool weartribology

Identifiers

PMID42654680
PMCPMC13514781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.