ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
External Magnetic Field-Assisted Porosity Reduction in Plasma Arc-Based Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposed porosity reduction technology for Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) of aluminum alloys that employ a static transversal External Magnetic Field (EMF) to control cathode spot (CS) behavior for the first time, thereby facilitating bubble release, mainly by accelerating the removal of oxide layer. This paper reported effects of EMF strength (Magnetic Flux Density: MFD) on porosity reduction. The pore diameter distributions showed that the number of pores at MFDs of 2 mT and 3 mT decreased to approximately half of that at 0 mT and 1 mT for pore diameters less than 60 μm, indicating that applying EMF with MFD higher than 2 mT especially contributed to reducing the pore formation. The observation presented that the Electrode Negative (EN) arc effectively melted the wire, and the Electrode Positive (EP) arc cleaned the oxide layer on the rear weld pool surface by CSs with EMF. There were two types of bubble release behavior: a weak eruption outside the arc root (Type A), and a strong eruption inside the arc root (or CS) (Type B). Type B is considered to be more effective for porosity reduction, being caused by oxide removal by CS. One possible explanation for this is that the gas bubbles trapped beneath the oxide layer could be strongly drawn out through CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.