ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Properties, Engineering Applications, and Mechanisms of Yellow River Silt and Sand in Construction Materials: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Yellow River sediment is a promising resource for use in construction materials. However, the effects of Yellow River silt and sand in different applications remain unclear. This review examines the physicochemical properties of these two forms, their engineering applications, and the underlying mechanisms governing material performance. Yellow River sand is mainly used as a fine aggregate in conventional concrete, engineered cementitious composites (ECC), and cement mortar, whereas Yellow River silt is commonly used in subgrade fills, concretes incorporating multiple solid wastes, and building products. Across these applications, the behavior of Yellow River sediment in construction materials reflects both physical packing and chemical reactivity. Their relative contributions depend on sediment form, material system, processing condition, and sediment content. Chemical reactivity is observed mainly in systems containing Yellow River silt, although the contribution of the silt itself has not been isolated. In conventional concrete, the highest compressive strengths are generally observed when Yellow River sand replaces 10-30% of natural sand, but the exact level depends on mixture design. Regional differences in sediment composition further limit the direct transfer of this range and require evaluation based on target performance. Future research should develop predictive models linking sediment characteristics, content, and target performance, establish low-carbon activation methods, and clarify long-term durability under complex service conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.