ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Study on the Microscopic Mechanism of Enhanced Oil Recovery by Nano-Surfactant Flooding System in Low Permeability Reservoirs.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study addresses the limitations of traditional chemical flooding in low-permeability reservoirs by developing a nanofluid-surfactant binary flooding system (Has5/iNanoW1.0 binary flooding system) and investigating its microscopic mechanisms and enhanced oil recovery performance. The size of the nanofluid-surfactant binary flooding system reduces from 250 nm to 72 nm compared with pure surfactant; therefore it can enhance the ability to inject smaller pores. Core adsorption tests reveal that the addition of nanofluid can decrease surfactant adsorption by over 30%. The nanoscale synergistic effect of nanofluid (iNanoW1.0) and surfactant (Has5) and lower adsorption of surfactant allows more surfactant (Has5) to enter smaller pores for oil washing, significantly increasing oil recovery performance. Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance displacement experiments show that the binary system can significantly expand microscopic sweep efficiency (up to 14.9%) compared to pure surfactant or nanofluid flooding. Core flooding tests confirm that the binary system exhibits lower injection pressure (0.377 MPa), achieving 13.12% incremental oil recovery during post-water flooding, which is significantly better than the pure surfactant system (5.11%). The results demonstrate strong laboratory-scale potential and permit further pilot-scale evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.