ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Digital Rhythm Surveillance After Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cancer Survivors: A Cardio-Oncology Survivorship Pathway.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery is often managed as a transient inpatient arrhythmia, yet recurrent or silent atrial fibrillation (AF) after discharge may identify persistent atrial vulnerability. This issue is particularly relevant in cancer survivors, whose thrombotic and bleeding risks vary according to cancer activity, treatment exposure, thrombocytopenia, frailty and planned procedures. For this narrative review, PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus were searched from inception to 16 June 2026, with Google Scholar used for supplementary citation tracking. A total of 50 publications were included in the final narrative synthesis. Direct evidence at the intersection of cancer, cardiac surgery, POAF and digital monitoring remains limited. Accordingly, the proposed "Digital Cancer-POAF Survivorship Pathway" is presented as a conceptual, hypothesis-generating framework, rather than a validated clinical algorithm. Its distinctive contribution is to connect cancer-state phenotyping and treatment-specific arrhythmic risk with post-discharge rhythm surveillance, electrocardiogram (ECG) confirmation, multidisciplinary interpretation, data governance and outcomes for prospective validation. Digital monitoring may increase AF detection; however, whether it reduces stroke, bleeding, readmission, or healthcare utilisation in this population is unknown. Neither a low detected AF burden nor the absence of AF during finite monitoring has been validated as an independent basis for anticoagulation decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.