ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2026
Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implications for Surgical Practice and Operating Theatre Design.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) has had significant effects over and above the more accurate component position it delivers. Diagnosis and templating are improved as a result of the planning CT scan. Complex cases involving abnormal anatomy are simplified surgically by a single ream for the acetabular component and feedback for hip length and offset for the femoral component. The learning curve for surgeons relates primarily to operative time rather than complications. Once planned, robotic systems may reduce variability in component positioning between surgeons with differing levels of experience. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) will need to be supplemented with gait lab data and functional tests to prove the added value of robotic-assisted THA. As robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) becomes increasingly reliant on imaging systems and digital workflows, operating theatres face greater complexity in technology integration and intraoperative coordination. Emerging evidence links spatial organisation, equipment positioning, and workflow to operative efficiency, intraoperative safety, and surgical performance. This paper provides an evidence-informed narrative perspective on how advances in robotic-assisted THA are influencing the spatial and functional requirements of operating theatres, thereby affecting clinical performance. As surgical practice advances, there is a need to move towards future-proofed design strategies informed by clinical performance and systems-based evidence. This includes a greater focus on flexibility and integrated digital infrastructure to support evolving technologies, changing team dynamics, and increasing procedural demands. Operating theatres must therefore evolve to enable effective integration of RAS in THA, and support improved patient safety and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.