ArticleNutrients2026
Clinician-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration for Mediterranean Meal-Plan Generation: Development, Technical Feasibility, and Professional Acceptability of the MAI-DIET Framework.
Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAdherence to the Mediterranean diet has declined in recent decades, highlighting the need for practical, technology-enabled tools to support its adoption. This study developed and evaluated MAI-DIET, a clinician-supervised, data-driven, AI-assisted programmatic framework designed to generate Greek-Mediterranean recipe-based meal plans for apparently healthy community-dwelling adults.
methodsMAI-DIET is combined with standardized food-composition and recipe libraries and a rule-based module that performs meal-plan generation and nutrient calculations. Claude Opus 4.7 supported predefined operator-supervised transformation tasks, and provided the interface for launching the rule-based module. Six 28-day recipe-based dietary plans were generated for hypothetical adults with energy goals ranging from 1600 to 2600 kcal/day. The generated plans were not tested in the intended population. For each plan, detailed nutritional analysis was performed according to predefined criteria. The quality of the dietary plans was assessed using validated scores, i.e., MedDietScore, dietary phytochemical index (DPI), and GR-UPFAST. Early-stage acceptability was evaluated by 103 healthcare professionals using a five-point Likert questionnaire.
resultsAll plans met the predefined energy criteria, while most nutrient targets were achieved. Deviations were observed for sodium, particularly in the higher-energy plans (reaching +36.3%), and for calcium, which was 17.5% below the EFSA population reference intake in the 1600 kcal/day plan. MedDietScore ranged between 35 and 36/55, while DPI was 47.0-50.9% and GR-UPFAST was 2.0-4.5/70. Overall acceptability was favorable (3.84 ± 0.59), with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.838-0.952.
conclusionsThe findings support the technical feasibility of the MAI-DIET framework and its preliminary acceptability among healthcare professionals. Further evaluation is required before conclusions can be drawn regarding its practical effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.