ArticleNutrients2026
Ultra-Processed Food-Rich Dietary Proxies, Dietary-Pattern Context, and Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Spain: Weighted Evidence Consistent with Age Confounding and Possible Reverse-Causality Bias from the 2023 Spanish Health Survey.
Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesUltra-processed foods (UPFs) are linked to cardiometabolic disease, but cross-sectional surveys often underestimate or invert these associations due to age structure, diagnosis-related dietary changes, and reporting bias. This study explores the potential influence of these biases and examines cross-sectional associations between dietary proxies and prevalent cardiometabolic conditions using the most recent national data from Spain.
methodsWe analyzed the 2023 Spanish Health Survey (n = 21,032). Body Mass Index (BMI) was derived from self-reported weight and height. Hypertension and diabetes were defined as self-reported medical diagnoses. Dietary items were mapped as UPF-rich proxies, processed-meat exposure, protective dietary markers, and beverage comparators. Weighted logistic models were adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Bias-probing analyses included stratification by self-rated health, exclusion of severe chronic comorbidities (n = 4107), and model-based beverage contrasts.
resultsPrevalence reached 53.6% for excess weight, 23.9% for prevalent hypertension, and 7.4% for prevalent diabetes. Weekly fast-food consumption was consistently associated with excess weight (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.35), obesity (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.50), prevalent hypertension (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37), and prevalent diabetes (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.61). Excluding participants with severe chronic comorbidities strengthened the fast-food association with prevalent diabetes (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.17-1.81).
conclusionsFast food emerged as the most consistent adverse dietary marker co-occurring across all prevalent outcomes, whereas processed meat was specifically associated with prevalent excess weight and obesity rather than prevalent cardiometabolic diagnoses. Stratified and sensitivity analyses provided empirical patterns consistent with age confounding and possible post-diagnosis dietary changes influencing cross-sectional associations, highlighting the need for cautious interpretation in public health surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.