ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Lipid Nanoparticles for Gene Therapy: Unresolved Challenges in Manufacturing, Transdermal Delivery, Machine Learning, Endosomal Escape, and the Protein Corona.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are now the leading delivery platform for nucleic acid therapeutics, but progress in the field is measured almost entirely by physicochemical and computational proxies rather than by functional properties that determine therapeutic outcomes. This review examines six interconnected areas of LNP development: microfluidic manufacturing, lyophilization, transdermal microneedle delivery, machine learning-guided formulation design, endosomal escape biology, and protein corona-mediated organ targeting. Although these areas are often discussed separately, they are linked by a common gap between routinely measured physicochemical or computational endpoints and the biological outcomes that determine therapeutic performance. A recently developed antifouling coating substantially reduced microfluidic channel fouling under the tested conditions, although its scalability remains to be validated. Lyophilization, by contrast, still requires formulation specific re-optimization for each new lipid composition, which remains an important barrier to clinical translation. In microneedle-based delivery, physicochemical integrity after fabrication is routinely treated as a proxy for therapeutic function, although, to our knowledge, no published study has directly compared endosomal escape capacity before and after microneedle fabrication. In machine learning, model accuracy is limited primarily by fragmented, outcome-biased training data rather than by algorithm design. Independent measurements of endosomal escape efficiency converge on a low ceiling whose biological origin, whether lipid-specific or inherent to the mechanism, remains unknown. For organ-selective targeting, one mechanistic account rests on a hypothesis tested in advance; another, equally prominent, has not been shown to have been anticipated rather than reconstructed after the fact. Closing this gap is now the field's central methodologically priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.