ReviewPharmaceutics2026
Artificial Intelligence and Natural Photosensitizer-Based Nanopharmaceuticals in Photodynamic Therapy: Advanced Modeling, Data-Driven Optimization, and Translational Perspectives.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive therapeutic modality based on the interaction between a photosensitizer (PS), light, and molecular oxygen to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) capable of inducing localized cytotoxicity. Natural products provide a chemically diverse source of photosensitizers, including curcumin, hypericin, hypocrellin, chlorin derivatives, alkaloids, flavonoids, anthraquinones, and other photoactive scaffolds. However, their translational development remains limited by poor solubility, aggregation, instability, variable purity, limited tissue penetration, suboptimal pharmacokinetics, and insufficient formulation readiness. In parallel, artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) modeling, radiomics, and predictive analytics, is increasingly being applied to photosensitizer discovery, molecular property prediction, nanoformulation optimization, treatment planning, and precision PDT. This critical review evaluates the intersection between AI, natural photosensitizers, nanopharmaceutical development, and PDT, with emphasis on methodological strengths, current limitations, and translational priorities. A PRISMA 2020-inspired search strategy identified 27 studies for qualitative synthesis, comprising 11 review articles and 16 original investigations, while additional seminal references were used for historical and mechanistic contextualization. The analysis indicates that current AI applications in PDT are concentrated around molecular property prediction, QSAR/QSPR modeling, phototoxicity assessment, radiomics, image-guided therapy, and treatment-response prediction, whereas AI-guided exploration of natural photosensitizer chemical space and AI-assisted nanoformulation design remain comparatively underdeveloped. Key barriers include heterogeneous datasets, limited natural-product representation in predictive models, insufficient external validation, weak integration between formulation variables and photodynamic outcomes, and limited consideration of manufacturing and regulatory requirements. This review proposes an integrated AI-enabled translational framework connecting natural-product chemical diversity, photochemical prediction, nanocarrier optimization, precision PDT validation, and clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.