ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Linear and Nonlinear Learning from Spectroelectrochemical Data: Interrogation of PLS and CNN Behavior Under Experimental Scarcity.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Spectroelectrochemistry (SEC) provides unique information-rich datasets by coupling molecular spectroscopic fingerprints with electrochemical activity. Despite its richness, direct machine-learning (ML) analysis of SEC data under realistic experimental constraints and scarcity remains unexplored. This work examines how much spectroscopically encoded electrochemical information can be learned from minimal SEC training data in a chemically reversible two-electron redox system, and how model choice interacts with limited experimental diversity across scan rate. Using purely experimental SEC datasets collected at four scan rates (2, 3, 5, and 7 mV/s), partial least squares (PLS) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) regressors are evaluated under several SEC-level training, validation, and test configurations. Model performance is assessed across three targets of increasing physical complexity, including species concentrations, derivative cyclic voltabsorptometry (DCVA) current, and experimental cyclic voltammetry (CV) current. Under single-SEC training, both models achieve the expected near-quantitative concentration prediction (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.