ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Interpretable Small-Sample Deep Learning with Approximate Attribution Enhancement for Atomically Precise Gold Nanoclusters Synthesis.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small experimental datasets make synthesis-condition modelling particularly sensitive to overfitting and data leakage. Here, a graph convolutional neural network (GCNN) was coupled with approximate attribution enhancement (AAE) and evaluated on 54 gold-nanocluster synthesis records using a strict fold-local pipeline. All preprocessing, supervised representation learning, augmentation, model selection, and calibration were confined to each training fold, and metrics were calculated only on untouched original records. The strongest no-augmentation model achieved a Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.729. With 20,000 fold-local AAE samples, Logistic Regression reached an accuracy of 0.864, an F1 score of 0.862, and an MCC of 0.758. The corresponding MCC values decreased to 0.579, 0.526, and 0.652 under leave-one-ligand-out, leave-one-publication-out, and leave-region-out evaluation, respectively, indicating that extrapolation beyond represented chemistry remained more difficult than random-fold interpolation. Feature, label-weight, augmentation-baseline, covariance, calibration, and stability analyses consistently identified ligand aromaticity, temperature, and HAuCl
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.