ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Functional Characteristics Derived from the Structural Design of Bispecific Antibodies.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are engineered to recognize either two distinct antigens or two different epitopes on the same antigen within a single molecule. This design varies according to the intended indication and mechanism of action; the factors considered during design are critical determinants of antigen binding, pharmacological activity, productivity, and safety. In this review, bsAbs are classified into fragment-based formats and Fc-containing IgG-like formats, with the latter further divided into symmetric and asymmetric architectures. Based on this structural framework, we discuss how key design parameters-including valency, epitope geometry, affinity and binding kinetics, and linker architecture-influence avidity, immune synapse formation, receptor clustering, signaling modulation, and toxicity profiles. We further compare preclinical and clinical examples across representative target combinations, including CD19 × CD3, CD20 × CD3, BCMA × CD3, HER2 × HER2, and EGFR × MET, to illustrate how different molecular formats yield distinct therapeutic outcomes even when the target combinations are similar. By linking structural classification with mechanism-based interpretation and within-target comparisons, this framework relates individual design variables directly to their preclinical and clinical consequences. Finally, we describe how the energy-based molecular modeling platform Rosetta and the deep-learning-based structure-prediction system AlphaFold are applied to support interface optimization, chain-pairing control, epitope geometry prediction, and structure-guided candidate prioritization. Overall, this review can provide a structure-function framework for bsAb design by integrating key structural determinants, their functional consequences, and emerging AI-based predictive strategies to facilitate the selection of optimal molecular architectures for specific therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.