ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Critical Evaluation of Key Elements in Manufacturing Procedures and Testing Methodologies for Ocular Anti-Infective Thin Film Inserts.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye drops remain the principal topical treatment for ocular infections, yet rapid precorneal clearance, variable dose delivery and limited tissue penetration can restrict local drug availability and necessitate frequent administration. Conjunctival inserts have long been investigated as a means of extending ocular residence and thin film inserts offer a more adaptable solid dosage form that may provide a defined drug-containing unit, prolonged local exposure and hydration-dependent dissolution or transformation within the conjunctival sac. Clinical translation remains limited by substantial variability in formulation design, manufacturing control and performance testing. This review critically evaluates the manufacture and characterisation of ocular anti-infective thin film inserts, with the aim of identifying the principal factors that determine reproducibility, interpretability and progression beyond formulation feasibility. Film architecture, polymer selection and drug-loading strategy are considered in relation to the physicochemical characteristics of the active pharmaceutical ingredient and the intended behaviour of the finished insert. Solvent casting remains the most extensively investigated manufacturing approach, while extrusion, electrospinning and additive manufacturing broaden the available processing options. Across these methods, incomplete specification of material and process variables frequently restricts comparison and reproducibility. Testing procedures are similarly heterogeneous and often assess individual attributes without establishing how the finished insert performs under conditions relevant to conjunctival administration. Particular limitations concern dosage-unit uniformity, hydration and matrix transformation, drug-release models and the interpretation of antimicrobial activity. Progression towards clinically relevant products will require indication-led development in which manufacturing control, pharmaceutical quality, ocular compatibility and biorelevant performance evaluation are considered as connected elements. This approach may provide a stronger basis for determining whether the potential advantages of ocular anti-infective thin film inserts can be translated into reproducible and clinically useful dosage forms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.