ReviewMicromachines2026
Design, Manufacturing, Tribology, and Performance of Microgears and Microgear Trains: A Critical Review of Mechanical Power Transmission at the Microscale.
Review in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microgears enable mechanical power transmission, speed reduction, motion conversion, and synchronization in compact devices ranging from microelectromechanical systems to miniature robots and optically driven micromachines. Their behavior cannot, however, be inferred by geometrically scaling conventional gears alone. As size decreases, relative manufacturing errors, surface forces, friction, adhesion, environmental sensitivity, and metrological uncertainty become increasingly important, while torque capacity and stored kinetic energy decrease rapidly. This critical review integrates the design, manufacture, tribology, and system-level performance of microgears and microgear trains. It first clarifies dimensional terminology and derives the principal scaling relationships. It then compares external, internal, planetary, worm, bevel, compliant, and reconfigurable transmission architectures; evaluates silicon micromachining, electroforming, micro powder injection molding, microforming, micro-electrical discharge machining, ultrashort-pulse laser ablation, and additive microfabrication; and examines adhesion, friction, wear, lubrication, and environmental effects. Particular attention is paid to transmission efficiency, starting torque, backlash, transmission error, lifetime, and the influence of the measuring instrument on the observed response. The literature remains strongly weighted toward manufacturability and isolated components, whereas reproducible, loaded, system-level tests are comparatively scarce. On this basis, the review proposes a unified hierarchy of validation, a minimum functional test matrix, and scale-aware design indicators. The central conclusion is that successful microgear transmissions require concurrent design of geometry, process, surface condition, environment, load path, and measurement strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.