ArticleMicromachines2026
A Defect Detection Method for Functional Membranes in Flexible Sensors for Vibration Monitoring During Glass Substrate Transfer.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vibration monitoring of glass substrate transfer systems is crucial for ensuring the stable operation of Flat Panel Display (FPD) manufacturing equipment. Fabrication defects in the functional nanofiber membrane of flexible vibration sensors can significantly degrade sensing performance and lead to inaccurate monitoring results. To address the challenge of achieving an effective balance between detection accuracy and inference efficiency in such defect-dense scenarios characterized by large variations in defect scale, this paper proposes a novel defect detection model, termed MA-YOLO. The proposed model incorporates four key architectural enhancements: the Multi-level Bidirectional Feature Aggregation Network (MLBAN), the Multi-Receptive Field Adaptive Fusion Module (MRAF), the Morphology-Adaptive Feature Extraction Module (MA-C2f), and the Interactive Dynamic Decoupling Head (IDDH). These components collaboratively improve defect feature extraction, multi-scale feature fusion, and localization performance while maintaining a lightweight architecture and high inference speed. Experimental results on a self-constructed defect dataset demonstrate that MA-YOLO achieves a mean Average Precision (mAP@0.5) of 91.9%, which is a 3.1 percentage point improvement over the baseline model. Moreover, with only 9.15 million parameters and an inference speed of 119.05 FPS, the proposed model exhibits superior overall performance compared with several mainstream and state-of-the-art object detection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.