ArticleMicromachines2026
Finite-Stroke Magnetic Quasi-Zero-Stiffness Electromagnetic Harvester for Foot-Worn Sensors: Reproducible Numerical Design Under Public Foot-IMU Excitation.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foot-worn electromagnetic harvesters are driven by irregular rigid-body motion, while their response is limited by mechanical stroke, coil geometry, mounting direction, and the electrical interface. This paper presents a reproducible numerical design study of a finite-stroke magnetic quasi-zero-stiffness (QZS) moving-magnet harvester. Two public three-axis foot-IMU records are processed with stated gyroscope-bias estimation, six-axis attitude estimation, gravity removal, residual-offset correction, filtering, and angular-acceleration calculation. Three explicit axes are used in the design screen, and the selected candidate is then evaluated over a 62-direction spherical grid. Rigid-body angular-acceleration and centripetal terms are included for specified sensor-to-harvester offsets. Two normalized magnetic force laws are compared. The electrical model uses position-dependent flux linkage, explicit series connection and polarity of coil sections, winding-derived resistance, and a position-dependent electromagnetic reaction force. A fixed-seed random screen evaluates 720 geometry-constrained candidates. The highest-ranked nominal candidate is a 150 mm external foot-worn module with a 40.6 g moving mass, a 30 mm hard half-stroke, 1649 turns in two series sections, and a 25.27 mm coil outer diameter. Across 72 design-screen cases formed from 12 five-second windows, three mounting axes, and two magnetic laws, this candidate remained hard-stroke- and design-stroke-safe. Its conditional ideal load-side power had a 10th percentile of 1.38 mW and a median of 2.03 mW. In the 62-direction check, all 1488 cases remained hard-stroke-safe; two opposite directions each produced one design-stroke exceedance, with a maximum displacement of 24.15 mm. Re-ranking all 30 Stage-2 candidates under coupling and magnetic-stiffness changes retained the long geometry family, although a 30% coupling reduction changed the highest-ranked candidate from 600 to 632. Soft-stop sensitivity, equation-level consistency, and multi-case Runge-Kutta convergence are also reported. The results support finite-stroke design screening, but they do not constitute prototype, finite-element, or delivered-power validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.